Who is Red John?

Theories of Mauricio Stankovic (16)

There has to be something with the pigeons...one flown away in s06e01, one in s06e03...SO, two down...4 more to be in following episodes...

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Guess what is the first line of partridge in mentalist:
"Red john enters here" !!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVmQFzq8Jeo


Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Pretty sure partridge (not the character but the human inside) is still alive...why? read on..

Well...Heller said there is a clue in the last sequence of s06e01. We saw a very different smiley in this episode that was drawn on Lisbon's face. People are thinking that it has open eyes because RJ did not kill Lisbon. But did anyone think of this: Where is the smiley for killing Partridge?
Yes...the smiley on the face of Lisbon is not for her but for Partridge. And it is different (had open eyes) not because RJ did not kill Lisbon but because he did not kill partridge. And I guess this is the big clue Heller is talking about...

For Guys who still do not believe that Partridge is alive:

Think yourself as RJ. You had two jobs to do:
1. Kill partridge
2. Kill Lisbon/ teach her a lesson for bugging cellphones

These two jobs are independent of each other..Why you will want them to be done simultaneously??
And there seems to be only one reason for me: Whoever RJ is, he wanted to show Lisbon that he killed Partridge...

And also there are many theories besides this: 
1. Partridge's throat was not slit
2. He was the woman feeding pidgeons in s06e02
3. Voice matches to RJ
etc.

My theory just tells why Partridge (not character but human) is still alive...Still I don't know who RJ may be...

So what do you think guys? Please comment if anything is wrong...



Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Definately when Heller asked about partridge's death, he had to say Yes he died. He can't say no he just faked it...
Similarly when partridge's character asked about giving voice to redjohn, he can't say Yes...

That does not mean partridge has to be red john..I just want to tell that we can not totally remove partridge from our consideration...

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Follow us on